Make (Integromat) vs ChatGPT
TL;DR — Quick Answer
ChatGPT wins this comparison with an overall score of 9.4/10 vs Make (Integromat)'s 8.7/10. ChatGPT leads on 4 of 5 scoring dimensions. For most users, ChatGPT is the better choice — but Make (Integromat) may suit specific workflows better.
Make (Integromat)
Visual automation for complex workflows
ChatGPT
The world's most versatile AI assistant
Score Comparison
| Dimension | Make (Integromat) | ChatGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 8.0 | 9.5 ✓ |
| Features | 9.1 | 9.6 ✓ |
| Value for Money | 9.3 ✓ | 8.8 |
| Performance | 8.8 | 9.4 ✓ |
| Support & Docs | 8.5 | 8.9 ✓ |
| Overall Score | 8.7 | 9.4 ✓ |
Pricing Comparison
Make (Integromat)
1,000 operations/month
$9/month (Core), $16/month (Pro)
ChatGPT
GPT-4o with limits
$20/month (Plus), $25/month (Pro)
Make (Integromat) — Pros & Cons
- More flexible than Zapier
- Better value for money
- Visual scenario builder
- Strong data transformation
- Steeper learning curve
- Less intuitive for beginners
- Fewer integrations than Zapier
ChatGPT — Pros & Cons
- Best-in-class multimodal capabilities
- Strong memory and personalization
- Massive plugin/GPT ecosystem
- Excellent voice mode
- Can hallucinate facts
- Browsing not always reliable
- No direct Google Workspace sync
Our Verdict: ChatGPT Wins
After independent testing, ChatGPT earns the edge with an overall score of 9.4/10 compared to Make (Integromat)'s 8.7/10. ChatGPT wins on 4 of 5 dimensions including Ease of Use and Features.
That said, Make (Integromat) remains a strong choice if you prioritise Value for Money. Both tools have free tiers or trials — we recommend testing both before committing.
Make (Integromat) vs Claude
Make (Integromat) vs Google Gemini
Make (Integromat) vs Grok
Make (Integromat) vs Perplexity AI