Make (Integromat) vs ElevenLabs
TL;DR — Quick Answer
ElevenLabs wins this comparison with an overall score of 9.2/10 vs Make (Integromat)'s 8.7/10. ElevenLabs leads on 4 of 5 scoring dimensions. For most users, ElevenLabs is the better choice — but Make (Integromat) may suit specific workflows better.
Make (Integromat)
Visual automation for complex workflows
ElevenLabs
The most realistic AI voice synthesis
Score Comparison
| Dimension | Make (Integromat) | ElevenLabs |
|---|---|---|
| Ease of Use | 8.0 | 9.0 ✓ |
| Features | 9.1 | 9.3 ✓ |
| Value for Money | 9.3 ✓ | 9.1 |
| Performance | 8.8 | 9.5 ✓ |
| Support & Docs | 8.5 | 8.8 ✓ |
| Overall Score | 8.7 | 9.2 ✓ |
Pricing Comparison
Make (Integromat)
1,000 operations/month
$9/month (Core), $16/month (Pro)
ElevenLabs
10,000 characters/month
$5/month (Starter), $22/month (Creator)
Make (Integromat) — Pros & Cons
- More flexible than Zapier
- Better value for money
- Visual scenario builder
- Strong data transformation
- Steeper learning curve
- Less intuitive for beginners
- Fewer integrations than Zapier
ElevenLabs — Pros & Cons
- Most realistic AI voices
- Voice cloning capabilities
- 29+ languages supported
- Real-time voice conversion
- Voice cloning requires consent
- Can be expensive for heavy use
- Occasional pronunciation errors
Our Verdict: ElevenLabs Wins
After independent testing, ElevenLabs earns the edge with an overall score of 9.2/10 compared to Make (Integromat)'s 8.7/10. ElevenLabs wins on 4 of 5 dimensions including Ease of Use and Features.
That said, Make (Integromat) remains a strong choice if you prioritise Value for Money. Both tools have free tiers or trials — we recommend testing both before committing.
Make (Integromat) vs ChatGPT
Make (Integromat) vs Claude
Make (Integromat) vs Google Gemini
Make (Integromat) vs Grok